Note: Time zones are important! We’ve taken care here to present all Q posts and Donald Trump tweets (Twitter posts) according to the exact moment in US Eastern (New York) time that they were originally published. Sometimes, this may vary from the times specified by qmap.pub or even Twitter, due to internal configurations or user browser settings.
President Trump frequently includes misspelled words or incorrect grammar in his tweets. If you post “orange” as “ornage” online somewhere and then Trump tweets “ornage” less than 24 hours later, that sounds like an amusing but meaningless coincidence.
If, however, you then post “” and exactly 15 minutes later, POTUS publishes back-to-back tweets one minute apart with the corrected word “orange,” that sounds much less like a coincidence. It doesn’t by itself prove that you’re working with the President, but if similar scenarios play out dozens of times over a two year period, and you gain a worldwide following of millions of people, it definitely makes me want to find out you have to say and whether there’s any truth to it.
I understand that cold reading and confirmation bias are common pitfalls. Here’s the timeline of January 7, 2018 so you can make up your own mind whether it seems like Q knew what POTUS was going to tweet and when.
Note the odd word choice: “win” instead of “when.”
A 10:21 pm Eastern time, POTUS published a tweet containing the first part of a quote from a New York Post article by Michael Goodwin, in which the word “consensual” appeared instead of the correct word, “consequential.” (POTUS later deleted the tweet after correcting the incorrect wording.)
Notice that the incorrect word, “consensual,” has no “q” in it, whereas the correct word, “consequential,” does contain the letter “q.”
Also notice the name “Goodwin” contains “win.”
At 10:36 pm Eastern time, 15 minutes after POTUS’s first tweet containing “consensual”, POTUS tweeted the rest of the quote, mentioning Goodwin by name. (POTUS later deleted this tweet, as you’ll read below.)
At 10:37 pm, anons began discussing the significance of the 15 min gap between the two POTUS tweets.
At 11:03 pm, an anon wrote: “Trump last posT was 27 min ago, still no reply by Q.”
Our theory on the meaning of this QAnon post:
- Q was confirming that the word choice of “Goodwin” was intentional and meant to signify Q’s collaboration with President Trump.
- [win]/when was a reference to the split tweeting (two separate tweets) by POTUS that had just occurred.
-  was a reference to the fact that the two POTUS tweets had been published 15 minutes apart.
11:18 pm – q500:
FIRE & FURY
(9) states of CLAS-ready go-live.
(34) commands LIVE.
CODES command ACTION.
 OWL ”
In the new set of back-to-back tweets, President Trump corrected “consensual” to “consequential.”
The  appears to have indicated that Q knew Trump was going to tweet the correct set of back-to-back tweets within one minute of each other, rather than 15 minutes apart as with the first pair of tweets.
11:23 PM – POTUS tweets the 10:21 Tweet again with the spelling corrected, “consequential”, and slightly updating wording.
11:23 pm – potus deleted the first tweet and posted an updated tweet that fixed the typo, adding the missing q:
“His is turning out to be an enormously consequential presidency. So much so that, despite my own frustration over his missteps, there has never been a day when I wished Hillary Clinton were president. Not one. Indeed, as Trump’s accomplishments accumulate, the mere thought of…
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 8, 2018
““His is turning out to be an enormously consequential presidency. So much so that, despite my own frustration over his missteps, there has never been a day when I wished Hillary Clinton were president. Not one. Indeed, as Trump’s accomplishments accumulate, the mere thought of…”
11:24 PM POTUS tweets the 2nd half of the sentence, same as at 10:36 PM PST.
11:24 pm – 1 min later, potus posts a companion tweet that completes the quote in the first tweet, and ends with “goodwin” (right before the article link). this was also 15 min after the q “ sig” post.
11:25 pm – anon notices the 11:23pm potus tweet: 10:25:26 ID: 9384bf No.20825
11:27 pm – q501:
“P_pers:  Confirmed.
FOR GOD & COUNTRY.
SKY FORTRESS ENGAGED>”
11:44 pm – q502:
“Original  min
DEFCON  CONF
Revised  min
11:45 pm – q503:
“Original missing “Q”
Revised including “Q”
11:46 pm – q504:
“WE ARE TALKING DIRECTLY TO THIS BOARD.
LEARN OUR COMMS.”
11:49 pm – q505:
“Marker  Confirmed.
Confirmed: 15, 10, 5, 1
January 8, 2018
source: http://archive.is/39pYc – storm #26
12:01 am – q506:
Do you understand what just occurred?
POTUS Tweets [15 min] between.
POTUS missing “Q” in select word.
DEFCON  POST HERE
POTUS mods Tweets [1 min] between.
POTUS adds “Q” in select word.
This was not meant to signify AUTH / established.
This is to train you how to understand the correlation between posts and Tweets.
Future proves past.
Wind the CLOCK.
The CLOCK and the GRAPHIC are ESSENTIAL.
Feel privileged – POTUS just spoke to this board [P_pers]
We serve at the pleasure of the President.”
12:20 am – q510:
“MISSING POST RE: DEFCON 
Directly after POTUS alters Tweets to  min interval and adds “Q” – use graphics.
3:00 am – q511:
“DEFCON does not refer to Defense r Condition w/ regards to prev post.
Now crystal clear.”
With post 511, Q seems to be saying, ‘We thought we were being clear at the time (post 498) that DEFCON wasn’t referring to a defense condition.’
Related 8chan “breads” (posting threads):
http://archive.is/fttws, https://archive.is/GM7kA – storm #25 – this thread happened 4 hours before what it looks like – so instead of 3:03 am January 8, 2018, Q’s 1st post in the thread was actually at 11:03 pm on January 7
http://archive.is/39pYc – storm bread #26
https://archive.is/JIJ4Z – storm bread #27
https://archive.is/SaKu4 – storm bread #28
What are the chances of all this synchronicity occurring by coincidence?
If you like this research and want more of it, please consider donating to JoyInLiberty.com. We’re currently writing a book about QAnon and would appreciate your support.
Contact us and let us know how we can improve this page.